[ 973SIMDSMDS19 ] SE Strategic Management in dynamic and complex environments
|
|
|
Es ist eine neuere Version 2023W dieser LV im Curriculum Master's programme General Management Austria/France 2024W vorhanden. |
|
(*) Unfortunately this information is not available in english. |
|
Workload |
Education level |
Study areas |
Responsible person |
Hours per week |
Coordinating university |
4 ECTS |
M1 - Master's programme 1. year |
Business Administration |
Regina Gattringer |
2 hpw |
Johannes Kepler University Linz |
|
|
|
Detailed information |
Pre-requisites |
(*)KS Creating Strategic Advantages
|
Original study plan |
Master's programme Management 2019W |
Objectives |
The main objectives of this seminar are that students explore concepts, tools and strategies which are suitable for dynamic and complex business environments. The focus is on analysis methods (e.g. foresight, strategic analysis in a dynamic business environment) and dynamic and open strategies.
|
Subject |
The students
- become familiar with analysis tools and methods which are suitable for dynamic, complex and global business environments
- explore foresight concepts and methods
- discuss the idea, the advantages and the limitations of open foresight projects
- understand the dynamics of strategies and strategizing
- explore the current and future importance of open strategies, and analyse the barriers and opportunities for transitioning to these open approaches
- identify how open strategies are applied in different industries
- reflect and explain the organizational changes needed for open strategies
- Learn to read, understand, and judge advanced research articles in the discussed fields of research.
|
Criteria for evaluation |
Seminar paper, final exam, participation
|
Methods |
Teaching and learning methods will be a mixture of traditional lecturing, class discussions and group work, role-plays and case studies.
|
Language |
English and French |
Study material |
To be announced
|
Changing subject? |
No |
|
|
|
On-site course |
Maximum number of participants |
25 |
Assignment procedure |
Assignment according to priority |
|