Inhalt

[ 929NSWSLIBK20 ] KS The Liberal Welfare State

Versionsauswahl
Workload Education level Study areas Responsible person Hours per week Coordinating university
5 ECTS M1 - Master's programme 1. year Social Science Margitta Mätzke 2 hpw (*)JKU Linz
Detailed information
Original study plan Master's programme Comparative Social Policy and Welfare 2025W
Learning Outcomes
Competences
  • Students will be able to understand and critically reflect on the institutional characteristics and ideological underpinnings of Liberal welfare and production regimes.
  • They will be able to analyse and evaluate the socio-economic origins, institutional designs, and societal consequences of Liberalism both as a political ideology and as an institutional framework.
  • They will be able to engage with and critique contemporary debates about the function and significance of liberal values and liberal policy design principles.
Skills Knowledge
  • Distinguish different strands of Liberalism and the institutional designs they inspire. (k4)
  • Analyse the socio-economic origins and consequences of Liberal welfare and production regimes. (k4)
  • Identify institutional designs in specific policy fields (k1)
  • Evaluate or organisational responses to challenges based on Liberal principles. (k4)
  • Critically discuss claims or fears about "liberalisation" or the "erosion of Liberal institutions" using theoretical and empirical evidence. (k5)
  • Synthesise insights from theoretical frameworks and empirical case studies to assess the impact of Liberalism in social policy. (k6)
  • Design small-scale comparative analyses to explore "varieties of Liberalism" across different geopolitical contexts. (k6)
  • Utilise secondary literature, social science data, and generative AI tools to develop evidence-based arguments, ensuring ethical and responsible research practices. (k3)
  • The theoretical and ideological foundations of Liberalism and its application in welfare and production regimes.
  • Key academic typologies of Liberal regimes, such as those by Esping-Andersen, Hall, and Soskice, and their relevance for understanding social policy.
  • Historical trajectories of Liberal welfare states, particularly the United States, as paradigmatic cases.
  • Current challenges and debates surrounding Liberal welfare systems, including critiques from European perspectives.
  • The conceptual and empirical tools necessary to analyse and evaluate the promises and pitfalls of Liberal institutional designs.
Criteria for evaluation Active participation during the Intensive Program and the interactive components of the long-distance phase of the class. Combination of a set of individual assignments or exams and tasks (such as research papers or presentations) to be accomplished in teams. In the retake-option evaluation is based on a written or oral exam.
Methods Introductory classroom sessions during the Intensive Program at the beginning of the semester, afterward a combination of individual studies of the relevant literature and interactive elements such as online meetings or teamwork. The retake option consists of an independent study of a reading list provided by the instructor.
Language English
Study material Readings and Assignments are provided by the instructor.
Changing subject? No
Further information Students who have received a failing grade, or who wish to retake the course to improve their grade, must declare their intention to retake the course before the next semester so that a retake opportunity can be offered. They will then repeat the course through independent study, studying the literature independently from a specially prepared reading list, and demonstrating their competence in a written or oral examination at the end of the semester. The retake option is not a substitute for the regular course. It is only offered to students who have received a grade in the regular course.
Earlier variants They also cover the requirements of the curriculum (from - to)
929NSWPLIBK14: KS The Liberal Welfare State (2014W-2020S)
On-site course
Maximum number of participants 30
Assignment procedure Assignment according to priority