 |
| Detailed information |
| Pre-requisites |
(*)keine, aber nicht neben der STEOP besuchbar
|
| Original study plan |
Bachelor's programme Business Administration 2025W |
| Learning Outcomes |
Competences |
| Learning Outcomes
The students have the competence to correctly carry out and critically reflect on all the basic steps in the process of creating a scientific paper. They are able to evaluate and reference literature in accordance with scientific standards, apply key empirical research methods and present research results in a structured manner.
|
|
| Skills |
Knowledge |
Learning Outcomes
- LO3: Students are able to structure scientific texts, develop relevant hypotheses and test them using appropriate research methods.
- LO4: Students are able to analyze scientific papers and can classify their relevance for their own research.
- LO5: Students can correctly use different citation styles and are able to write scientific papers in accordance with academic standards.
|
Learning Outcomes
- LO1: The students are familiar with the scientific research process, know the structure and quality criteria of scientific work and are able to differentiate scientific literature from popular literature.
- LO2: The students have in-depth knowledge of qualitative and quantitative research methods and their areas of application.
|
|
| Criteria for evaluation |
Assessment criteria and assessment scheme
A total of 100 points can be achieved in this course, of which 65 points are for the exam and 35 points for group work including presentation and discussion. To receive a positive assessment, more than 50% (> 50 points) of the possible points must be achieved.
1st exam:
Individual exam lasting 60 minutes. There is the option of retaking it (re-exam).
2nd group work:
Paper discussion. Critical analysis and comparison of published journal articles followed by presentation of the results.
Feedback culture
There is an open and learning-promoting feedback culture. The results of the group work are discussed with the involvement of fellow students (learning from each other), and feedback relevant to the assessment is always confidential and individual. There is the option of viewing the exam and receiving personal feedback from the course leader. Students are also encouraged to give the course leader feedback in the lectures and also have the opportunity to participate anonymously in the JKU course evaluation.
Synchronization of learning outcomes and assessments
- LO1: Written exam + group work
- LO2: Written exam + group work
- LO3: Written exam + group work
- LO4: Written exam + group work
- LO5: Written exam + group work
|
| Methods |
The KS uses a combination of different teaching methods to
- maximize student motivation and attention and
- achieve the learning objectives in the didactically best way.
This includes the following:
- Teacher-centered information input, supported by slides
- Interactive review blocks at the beginning of the lecture
- Self-directed learning, supported by supplementary materials in Moodle
- Peer learning and practical relevance as part of a group work to analyze selected journal articles, followed by presentation and discussion in the lecture
|
| Language |
German or English |
| Study material |
- Script + supplementary materials in Moodle
- Best practices from recognized academic journals
- Döring, N., Bortz, J. (2016). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften, 5. Auflage, Springer.
|
| Changing subject? |
No |
|
